与法律有关的英语论文选题题目大全

自己去看下（法学）吧，看下别人的论题是什么，你参考学习下

The theory of criminal law of shallow understanding irrtumslehreLegal irrtumslehre， namely， refers to the illegality mistake for own behavior in law， whether what crime constitutes a crime shall be punished by， or what is wrong， is to oneself the legal nature of the action of meaning or Legal irrtumslehre usually includes three conditions: (1) the actor's behavior in law does not constitute a crime， the offender and constitutes a crime for which imaginary guilty， (2) the behavior in law constitutes a crime and does not constitute a crime， the offender mistaken assumptions that innocent， (3) for his act constitutes a crime shall be convicted and punishment in light of the existing errors， misunderstanding or Due to the legal irrtumslehre， only to the behavior of the offender is not correct understanding of the legal assessment， and for their actions in fact correct understanding of the situation is still there， so its act constitutes a crime shall be investigated for criminal responsibility is and how it is not usually （1）Imaginary innocent treatment principleThe principles for imaginary innocence， whether it involves a deliberately Foreign criminal law theory basically has the following kinds:1）Should know that don't speak， just for criminal facts have Canada criminal code article 19 regulation: "the ignorance of the law excuses and crime can be ShuZui " Motto: "Roman law and legal disclaimer" somehow also expressed a principle， namely: "in the crime as subjective FanYi established condition， not request to recognize his behavior of richtswitrig"2）Should know the reason， according to two: moral responsibility theory， personality responsibility Moral responsibility theory emphasizes on the rationality of free will blame illegal conduct， is considered to be objective 3）That said， the possible illegality of responsibility for deliberately， at least to the possibility of understanding While in China mainland， the introduction of the concept of crime has another concept -- social consciousness that harm to discuss richtswitrig already Because the deliberate crime according to law condemn the illegality of the offender is not known， the law itself is not damaged， the law of the social consciousness is Social harm consciousness is the essential contents of the crime， illegal consciousness is the legal form of social Therefore， our country law more emphasis is on the rationality of essence， which is harmful to the society Just because of its social harmfulness， with a social moral evaluation colour， easier for people to grasp and Therefore， the author thinks that， in general， the person need to recognize his behavior may be the result of inevitable or harmful to the society， and has already With intentionally But in fact， the forbidden by law and mass that is harmful to the society in our country nowadays the behavior under the constitution should be consistent， in other words， know the social harmfulness also know the possibility of illegal， but know the possibility of illegal is inevitable should also realize social harmfulness， both are Therefore， it is generally thought that the law is no excuse， the reason of law does not exclude the misunderstanding in principle， but can be culpable for deliberately （2） Misunderstandings treatment PunishmentWe might as well so the essence of blame for his due: the crime in the subjective should blame or blame， for the intent or negligence If the offender because of misunderstanding that legal person feels very innocent， lack of this should blame or condemning sexual， from the fundamental measure， blame is absolutely not consider Especially in the modern society， the legal category SAN marino， legal entry in different fields and different levels of books， recognized， comprehend legal apparently endless and same， so the person of law and misunderstandings， not Now， both in theory and practice， the method not cling to forgive "seems to have in Therefore， to a certain extent， can also think admits exceptions excusable is legal misunderstanding of criminal law is an important symbol of In addition， it was not in the act of which is prohibited by the laws and regulations， especially after a circumstance， should have knowledge of richtswitrig actor， constitute the understanding of deliberate point of view， with the attitude of this understanding， of course， that is not the illegality or by the simple statement The author thinks that the only when the legal establishment of may， FangKeZu but The fact mistakeThat mistake， is to determine its subjective behavior nature and the criminal responsibility of the relevant facts wrong From the wrong reasons and phenomenon of angles， generally known that there are several mistakes:（1） Object irrtumslehreThe object is known for errors， whether there is objectively error It includes actor in the implementation of the existing criminal behavior of the hazards for the object and actually does not exist， or for criminal object and actually does not exist， or infringe a criminal object and actually invaded another crime The object of objects is usually known errors caused by mistake， but the object of different social relationship reflects Evil doer of objects and actual expected in fact not only harm object does not agree， and in the nature of law is not Therefore， the object irrtumslehre may affect the form of sin， crime accomplishment， and may even attempted to influence the For example， in view of the circumstances， not a thought before the enemy， and a party came to stick， afterwards just know the ox was A thought of damage is "people"， and the actual wounded is "cow"， do not belong to the same laws of the Similar situation and will generally be mistaken for drug trafficking items， Actor will stolen items in the theft of guns in stealing This object from the subjective errors， see， is a kind of mistake， From the objective， because the mistake crime to no avail， where the criminal attempted 1）Object mistakeObjects can be generalized mistake， including object mistake to belong to the object know mistake is inevitable object These include， is known to be wrong object of legal property of the same object mistake and legal properties of different objects， namely the object irrtumslehre In order to distinguish with the object mistake here， the cognition to the same object only mean error between the different objects， namely the misunderstanding of the evil doer expected objects and actual harm to the object， but not in fact in the legal nature of the same This object mistake again say things on purpose mistake not criminal As a reserve， killing b shall be killed as b and c， do not affect a This is the need to consider that a kill b behavior "mistake" cause others (c)， belong to an intentional crime (b) "death"， for the excess result， according to the results， which determine the ordinary mail of death was deliberately recognized for deliberately， to the death of the fault is propylene， identified as negligence， according to the intention or negligence of the general mark recognized FanYi or state of mind， not applicable rules of the 2） Behavior irrtumslehreBehavior mainly includes two kind of mistake: first， the behavior nature That actor has to its social harm nature， such as understanding not imaginary Behavior nature mistake might affect the form of sin， and may also affect Second， the behavior tools (methods) That person to use when the conduct of tool (methods)， which affects not correct understanding of harm results， behavior tools (methods) mistake can affect crime or attempted was founded， also can affect crime or belongs to the incident， a typical for murder on hazardous substances， because the drug failure and failed to kill people， can think method or tools for error doer of consciousness beyond reason not to And as actor see armour， second coming together， hence shot to play， but can't hit by the party Look， this is from the phenomenon of an object， or the final results for the mistake， but this error is based on the fact that the wrong doer identify offender is carefully identify to begin， can think recognize is accurate， errors in ChaWu The solution to this situation， "said"， its legal with qualitative and recognize wrong object is consistent， namely directly recognized as an intentional homicide The death of a person is directly intentionally to b， death is the indirect intentional， just for a to b is attempted， Additionally， if in daily life because misidentification object and damage of consequences， the crime itself is not just any criminal negligence because of 3)Causality irrtumslehreCausality mistake， is on his behavior and harmful results of actual connection between Generally include: first， not some harm result， as has happened This generally constitute a Second， has certain harm result， but not for actor or for his behavior is caused， and does not affect crime Third， really happened， the offender is aware of its behavior， but with the actual development between the harm to the process or a mistake， general to punish crime In theory， the offender is not only a crime， but continuous movement， this several continuous action is not a few crime， but a In this sense， doesn't exist on the results of the Legal irrtumslehre and facts mistake and proceduresDomestic scholars in fact know mistakes and errors between the issue legal representative views mainly include:（1）For own behavior whether in law constitutes a crime， criminal or what kind of criminal punishment shall be under the incorrect understanding is legal irrtumslehre for his behavior on the implementation of the incorrect understanding is the fact that mistake，（2）The objectivity of crime is a false understanding of crime， that mistake of objective facts have clear understanding， only to act in the evaluation of existing laws on the concept of law is not correct mistakes。（3）Actor known facts and actual fact don't agree is wrong， the person that judgment and objective law is law of illegal inconsistency These ideas basically could in theory and legal irrtumslehre fact distinguish mistakes， it is important to emphasize that：1) With the conviction that the so-called irrelevant， as this mistake to hit each other， the shooting head caused the death of heart， without vision of research into 2) Study of the theory of error， error occurs when the purpose， but whether to intentionally resistance， reduce plots affected only the wrong cognition， natural sentencing nor will it into the error theory 3) This does not constitute a crime and actor for crime， and for their behavior in the criminal law on the crimes and how to apply for criminal punishment on such specific knowledge error， conviction according to Based on this， the author thinks that， at the fact that criminal law is only to know wrong doer of elements to know the so-called objective facts constituents of mistake is the fact that the legal irrtumslehre error refers to the legal action is illegal and the evaluation of the From the theory of facts and legal irrtumslehre error， but the problem is in the law， criminal elements to the facts and law closely combined circumstances (like some administrative crimes and economic crimes)， or is in a fact itself contains certain laws of evaluation content， to distinguish with a mistake is the fact that mistake or legal wrong， is often If the property of his humanity and obscenity obscenity， administrative rules and regulations， JinYuOu， disrupt public until its precondition of the legitimacy of the public， and legal irrtumslehre facts wrong intertwined， and this is what we distinguish facts and legal irrtumslehre errors will solve the In some cases， the defendant should know that because of the lack of knowledge， and not to the behavior of social harmfulness， so that the defendant is not "knowledge they will entail harmful consequences to society， and hope or allows such results" and deliberate crime， the burden of proof is only FanYi prosecution， in addition， prosecution without proof the defendant not normal， but normal mental and spiritual normal presumption defendant directly if the defendant that his spirit is not normal， it shall provide necessary evidence by himself to Thus， the author， on legal irrtumslehre processing， can adopt the presumption of ways to Which country presumption every normal citizens are known， unless the law can put forward defense "advantage prove" above， or the evidence rebut these presumption is From the efficiency of lawsuit， said the country is impossible to prove the defendant is known of the

1、网约车违约的法律问题研究　　2、论家庭暴力的法律对策研究　　3、我国失地农民社会保障问题探讨　　4、论环境污染侵权责任制度的完善---以XX县为例　　5、校园暴力的成因及法律预防　　6、论我国持有型犯罪的立法缺陷与完善　　7、论大学生兼职的劳动权益保护　　8、论法律行为和情谊行为的区分　　9、小额贷款公司法律问题研究　　10、论劳动合同法中的竞业限制制度　　11、论共同犯罪中刑事责任的扩散　　12、论合同诈骗罪　　13、论网络时代的隐私权保护　　14、企业高管人员适用劳动法问题研究　　15、网络交易平台消费者保护法律责任　　以上论文题目由学术堂整理提供

教学法的没问题这样可以的　是文章主要内容的摘录，要求短、精、完整。字数少可几十字，多不超过三百字为宜。　　随着计算机技术和因特网的迅猛发展，网上查询、检索和下载专业数据已成为当前科技信息情报检索的重要手段，对于网上各类全文数据库或文摘数据库，论文摘要的索引是读者检索文献的重要工具，为科技情报文献检索数据库的建设和维护提供方便。摘要是对论文综合的介绍，使人了解论文阐述的主要内容。论文发表后，文摘杂志或各种数据库对摘要可以不作修改或稍作修改而直接利用，让读者尽快了解论文的主要内容，以补充题名的不足，从而避免他人编写摘要可能产生的误解、欠缺甚至错误。所以论文摘要的质量高低，直接影响着论文的被检索率和被引频次。　　1．摘要的规范　　摘要是对论文的内容不加注释和评论的简短陈述，要求扼要地说明研究工作的目的、研究方法和最终结论等，重点是结论，是一篇具有独立性和完整性的短文，可以引用、推广、扩展。　　2．撰写摘要注意事项　　①不得简单重复题名中已有的信息，忌讳把引言中出现的内容写入摘要，不要照搬论文正文中的小标题（目录）或论文结论部分的文字，也不要诠释论文内容。　　②尽量采用文字叙述，不要将文中的数据罗列在摘要中；文字要简洁，应排除本学科领域已成为常识的内容，应删除无意义的或不必要的字眼；内容不宜展开论证说明，不要列举例证，不介绍研究过程；　　③摘要的内容必须完整，不能把论文中所阐述的主要内容（或观点）遗漏，应写成一篇可以独立使用的短文。　　④摘要一般不分段，切忌以条列式书写法。陈述要客观，对研究过程、方法和成果等不宜作主观评价，也不宜与别人的研究作对比说明。

与法律有关的英语论文选题题目

一、什么是探究式教学法二、探究式教学法在英语教学中应用的必要性。这部分主要探讨，英语教学中应注意的方法与步骤，以及其他教学法在英语教学中存在的问题及不足；三、探究式教学法在英语教学中应用的案例分析四、总结大概就是这个思路吧，其实我觉得大学毕业论文大概就是遵循一个是什么、为什么，怎么办的顺序。因为大学本科阶段的知识结构和知识量只能让我们做到这么多。满意请采纳。

论文题目不仅能准确反映论文特定的核心内容，也是专家审稿和读者最先映入眼帘的内容如何拟定一篇英语论文题目呢?学术堂在此提供了20条优秀的英语专业论文题目供大家参考:　　1、高中英语情境教学的应用研究　　2、中高职公共英语课程有效衔接研究　　3、朗读时长对初中生英语学习成绩的影响　　4、中职英语任务型教学应用研究　　5、多元智能理论在中职学前教育专业英语教学中的应用　　6、高中小组合作式过程写作实验研究　　7、第八届全国高中英语课堂教学观摩课课堂导入活动研究　　8、积极情感在初中英语词汇教学中的实验研究　　9、成长期初中英语教师的教学设计现状研究　　10、基于英文绘本的小学高年段英语阅读教学实践研究　　11、通识教育视角下高职院校英语综合课程开发研究　　12、初中优秀英语教师课堂提问研究　　13、初中英语家庭作业现状研究　　14、初中英语学习中汉语语音迁移影响因素研究　　15、高三学生英语写作中的错误分析　　16、形成性评价在高中英语写作教学中的实证研究　　17、南疆地区维吾尔族高中生三语习得现状调查研究　　18、中职生英语学习动机现状与调控策略研究　　19、基于教师介入的初中英语自主学习研究　　20、优课系统在小学英语课堂教学中的应用研究

1、以问题为中心，探索法学课程教学改革——以国际商　　法教学改革调查分析为例　　2、《国际商法》课程教学改革实施措施浅谈　　3、浅议双语教学的目标、模式及资源开发——以《国际商法》教学为例　　4、谈高职院校非法律专业的国际商法教学　　5、国际商法课程双语教学研究初探　　6、非法学专业法学课程教学方法探讨——以《国际商法》课程为例　　7、国际商法专论　　8、基于工作过程导向的高职国际商法实务教材开发　　9、《国际商法》课程教学内容与教学方法的改革　　10、高职类国际贸易专业法律教学改革之探讨——兼论经济法和国际商法课程的整合　　11、对国际商法与国际经济法关系的深层思考　　12、国际商法双语教学若干问题研究　　13、略论国际商法中的“标准格式之战”　　14、对国际贸易专业《国际商法》课程教学方法的探讨　　15、国际经济与贸易专业国际商法双语教学的思考来源　　（以上内容由学术堂整理提供）

自己去看下（法学）吧，看下别人的论题是什么，你参考学习下

与法律有关的英语论文题目

The subject is: a blatant crime on the criminal law of the theoretical knowledgeAbstract: a flagrant crime as a general social phenomenon， has been in existence for thousands of years of social history; including， in particular the concept of school as a flagrant crime committed， it can be said with the general sense of the crime have simultaneously; the concept of criminal law as a flagrant offenders has also been historically exist in human society a thousand Openly committed as a criminal and the negative cultural expressions， whether it is the specificity of the Criminal Code norms on moral values or the reverse， and are worthy of criminal law theory researchers to explore in However， for a long time， China's Criminal Law on the "objective elements constitute a crime，" the study focus， multi-objective aspects of running an essential element， that is against the act， against the findings and results of behavior and the causal relationship between on; for the crime as an objective choice of the implementation of elements of the crime the way， but rarely get In this paper， exploring a flagrant crime， not only confined to the study of criminal law perspective， but also learn from the crime， ethics， sociology， such as the perspective of the norms of a flagrant offense， the nature of black social evil， the negative value and its comprehensive evaluation Author through so many levels， multi-angle discussion to a more deepening and comprehensive three-dimensional interpretation that the truth will be openly committed to maximize the show in the face of social and readers， so expect it to for the development of China's Criminal Jurisprudence criminal applications of the research on the subject domain， to make its own modest Key words: flagrant flagrant crime

题目：With regard to criminal law theory in the understanding of a flagrant crime正文：Flagrant crime as a general social phenomenon， has been in existence for thousands of years of social history; including， in particular the concept of school as a flagrant crime committed， it can be said with the general sense of the crime have simultaneously; the concept of criminal law as a flagrant offense， has historically existed in thousands of human Openly committed as a criminal and the negative cultural expressions， whether it is the specificity of the Criminal Code norms on moral values or the reverse， and are worthy of criminal law theory researchers to explore in However， for a long time， China's Criminal Law刑法理论界on the "objective elements constitute a crime，" the study focus， multi-objective aspects of running an essential element， that is against the act， against the findings and results of behavior and the causal relationship between on; for the crime as an objective choice of the implementation of elements of the crime the way， but rarely get In this paper， exploring a flagrant crime， not only confined to the study of criminal law perspective， but also learn from the crime， ethics， sociology， such as the perspective of the norms of a flagrant offense， the nature of black social evil， the negative value and its comprehensive evaluation Author惟愿through so many levels， multi-angle discussion to a more deepening and comprehensive three-dimensional interpretation that the truth will be openly committed to maximize the show in the face of social and readers， so expect it to for the development of China's Criminal Jurisprudence criminal applications of the research on the subject domain， to make its own modest 摘要的英文是:Abstract关键词是：Key words内容是：Flagrant；Flagrant crime

O J Simpson murder case辛普森杀妻案The O J Simpson murder case has been described as the most publicized criminal trial in history，[1] in which O J Simpson， former American football star and actor， was brought to trial for the murder of his ex-wife Nicole Brown Simpson and her friend Ronald G Simpson was acquitted in 1995 after a lengthy trial， the longest jury trial in California [2]Simpson hired a high-profile defense team led by Johnnie Cochran and F Lee B Los Angeles County believed it had a solid prosecution case， but Cochran created in the minds of the jury the belief that there was reasonable doubt about the DNA evidence (then a relatively new type of evidence in trials)，[3] including that the blood-sample evidence had allegedly been mishandled by lab scientists and [4] Cochran and the defense team also alleged other misconduct by the Los Angeles Police D The televising of the lengthy trial riveted national attention on the dramatic By the end of the criminal trial， national surveys showed dramatic differences between most blacks and most whites in terms of their assessment of Simpson's [5]Later， both the Brown and Goldman families sued Simpson for damages in a civil trial， which has a lower standard of proof for determining [citation needed] On February 5， 1997， the jury unanimously found there was a preponderance of evidence to find Simpson liable for damages in the wrongful death of Goldman and battery of B In its conclusions， the jury effectively found Simpson liable for the death of his ex-wife and Ron G[6] On February 21， 2008， a Los Angeles court upheld a renewal of the civil judgment against 这个案子很经典，上面的一段是wiki上的英文案例，你可以找一些关于这个的中文资料，然后选择一个角度（比如种族歧视与陪审团制度的矛盾、毒树之果原则、媒体和舆论与司法公正的矛盾等等），或者一篇参考的中文文章（很多中国的法律人也会研究这个案子，发表一些观点），自己写或者翻译一篇英文论文出来就是了。下面引用一段英文资料，有个人在提问，为什么法院在刑事诉讼中判决辛普森无罪，但是在民事诉讼中又判决他赔偿自己妻子死亡赔偿金。 Jeralyn Merritt对这个问题进行了简略的回答。我想你大一的论文，字数要求不会太多，所以参考一下他这段答复吧。如果字数不够就把上面wiki的资料加一些进去，简单的交待一下案情。Q I am a high school government student， and I have a question that has been bothering me that my teacher refuses to In the OJ Simpson case I know that the state jury did not find him guilty on the charge of murder， but the federal court did on the charge of wrongful What is the difference and why were they able to do that? -- Geni A OJ Simpson was charged with first degree murder in the state court in C The jury found him "Not G" A "not guilty" verdict means the state failed to prove the charges "beyond a reasonable doubt"， which is the standard of proof in all criminal Criminal cases are brought on behalf of the citizens of a particular state or federal district， not by the victims or their After OJ Simpson was found not guilty in the criminal case， the families of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman sued him in the state (not federal) court in California for wrongfully causing their Civil lawsuits for wrongful death are tried for money damages， not to put the defendant in Civil cases are brought in the name of individuals， not in the name of the SDifferent evidence was introduced in the OJ Simpson civil and criminal For example， although OJ Simpson denied it， evidence was presented in the civil trial that OJ Simpson owned a pair of Bruno Magli shoes that matched shoeprints left at the murder OJ Simpson exercised his constitutional right against self-incrimination and chose not to testify in the criminal All defendants in criminal cases have this In the civil trial， OJ no longer had such a right because he had been found not guilty of murder and could not be tried again for He had to testify when the opposing side called him as a Thus， the jury in the civil case got to hear OJ's testimony while the criminal jury did In the criminal case， the jury got to see that the glove left at the scene of the crime did not fit OJ S This experiment was not repeated for the civil The jury in the criminal trial got a far stronger portrayal of the problems with the DNA and other scientific evidence in the case， and the poor management of the crime scene， than did the civil And the criminal jury got to hear the false testimony of Los Angeles police officer Mark Furman， who later admitted lying and pleaded guilty to Finally， the burden of proof in criminal and civil cases is In criminal cases， the standard is "proof beyond a reasonable " There is also a presumption of innocence that stays with the defendant until and unless the jury returns a guilty In civil cases， the standard of proof is "by a preponderance of the evidence，" which essentially means "more likely than not，" or put another way， proof by 51% or The jury's verdict in the civil case was not that OJ Simpson was guilty of murder， but that he was liable for (which essentially means responsible for causing) the deaths of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron GIn light of the different evidence presented， burdens of proof and ultimate issues the juries were called upon to decide， the verdicts in the criminal and civil trials were not really all that -- Jeralyn Merritt

与法律有关的英语论文选题题目有哪些

我才写完毕业论文，简直是折磨！我把我们系的题目给你，参考看看吧。我写的是文化类的。其实文学和文化类要比翻译和教育类好写得多，网上可以找到的参考资料也多。英美人文和历史研究：1，从跨文化的角度谈汉英思维及表达方式的差异2，论美国垮掉的一代3，美国牛仔的成功之路4，文艺复兴在英国文学史中的作用5，跨文化交际中英汉礼貌与面子6，中西方饮食文化的对比研究7，西方节日的变迁及文化内涵8，电影《喜福会》所表现的中西方文化差异（我就是这个题目）9，中美教育制度及教育理念的对比研究10，英汉称谓的差异及其文化内涵11，希腊神话对英美文化的影响12，英汉商标对英美文化的影响13，英语习语与西方文化14，浅谈英美姓氏的起源及文化内涵15，中美高等教育大众化路径的比较16，《阿甘正传》承载的美国青年文化17，《阿甘正传》美国传统价值观的呼唤与回归18，浅谈美国文化中的实用主义19，论美国宗教与政治20，《圣经》的文学性及其对中西文学的影响评述选题注意事项：1，选你自己感兴趣的题目，毕业论文是个浩大的工程，要是不能写自己想写的，相信我，在这漫长的写作时间里，你会相当痛苦的。2，题目不能太大，也不能太小，否则不好驾驭。最好是那种“从小角度看大问题”的题目。例如，我写喜福会这部电影，电影体现了中美文化差异，分别有婚姻观，家庭教育观等。但是我以一部电影为出发点，这个角度就比较小。话说中西方文化的差异实在太多了，但是我只从喜福会这部电影出发，所以范围就缩小了。再者，没什么人写这个电影，所以也不容易和别人雷同，不是被写滥了的题目。3，这个题目是好找资料的，毕竟是本科论文，不是研究生或是博士的论文，写作水平有限，平时最多写写几百字的作文忽然要写几千字，想必是非常困难的。所以内容不可能完完全全出自“自己”，于是就要大量的从网上，参考书上，图书馆搬来。所以最好就是找参考资料比较多的题目，切忌是参考，不是照搬，可以PARAPHRASE里面的内容到自己的论文。差不多就这些了，我觉得这几点是最重要的，如果你有几个拿不定主意的题目，可以找论文指导老师问问看，当时我开笔写论文前，都找老师问了，老师比较有经验，他应该可以给你很多建议。

自己去看下（法学）吧，看下别人的论题是什么，你参考学习下

选什么主题不都可以吗，这有什么，你又不是法律翻译专业非得是翻译方面的，或者非得选某个方向。

与法律有关的英语论文选题题目怎么写

选什么主题不都可以吗，这有什么，你又不是法律翻译专业非得是翻译方面的，或者非得选某个方向。

Study on the Child Image of the Catcher in the Rye From Linguistic Perspective 从语言的角度分析《麦田里的守望者》中的儿童形象A CHILD OF NATURE: ON EMILY DICKINSON'S NATURE COMPLEX 璞玉无暇，浑然天成：论艾米莉狄金森的自然情结A POLYPHONIC ANALYSIS OF THE SOUNF AND FURY “对位法”分析《喧哗与骚动》The Use of Zero Article Before Class Nouns 类名词前的零冠词用法解析An Analysis of Factors of Martin Eden's Suicide 导致马丁伊登自杀因素的分析Factors Affecting Marriage in Pride and Prejudice <<傲慢与偏见〉〉中影响婚姻的因素A Probe into Anti-slavery of Mark Twain--From the Perspective of Jim in The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn 探讨马克吐温的反奴隶制--对《哈克贝利芬历险记》中吉姆的分析The Use OF Body Language In English Teaching 肢体语言在英语教学中的应用Task-based Language Teaching and Its Application in China 任务教学法及其在中国的应用Various Circumstances That the Inversion Is Used Under and Comparison with Chinese 运用到状的多种情形及与汉语的比较Individual Factos Contributing to Gatsby's Tragedy 导致盖茨比悲剧产生的个人因素The Direct Method and Its Application in Juvenile English Teaching 直接教学法及其在少儿英语教学中的应用On Social Factora to the Failure of the Americam Dream——A Contrast between Gatsby and Willy Loman 论美国梦破灭的社会因素——盖茨比和威力洛曼的比较On the Psychological Development of Tom in The Grapes of Wrath论《愤怒的葡萄》中汤姆的心理变化Study on the Teaching of Culture 浅析文化教学Culture Conmflicts in English Teaching 英语教学中的文化冲突Cultural Differences of Chinese and English Color Words 中英颜色词的文化差异A Research of Rhetoric in Jane Eyre 关于《简爱》中修辞的研究On the Causes of Tess's Tragedy 论苔丝悲剧的原因On Symbolism and Portraiture in The Great Gatsby 论《了不起的盖茨比》中的象征主义和人物描写Multianalysis of "the Lost Generation" in The Sun Also Rises 透视《太阳照样升起》中的“迷惘的一代”On Robinson Crusoe's Character 鲁滨逊人物分析The Use of Symbolism in Scarlet Letter 论《红字》中象征手法的运用On the Writing Features Of The Cal l of the Wild 论《野性的呼唤》的写作手法Character Analysis of Santiago in The Old Man and The Sea 《老人与海》主人公——桑提亚哥形象分析Communicative Approach of English Teaching 英语教学之交际法On the Theme of For Whom the Bell Tolls 论《丧钟为谁而鸣》的主题思想How to Be a Good Guide in English Teaching in Middle School 怎样在中学教学中做好引导者