期刊论文专家评审和写作意图不一致的原因
因为随机分配。提交前仔细阅读提交注意事项，必须遵循期刊的要求，否则编辑可能每天面临大量的评论（特别是高级期刊），看到你的文章格式非常混乱，可能会推迟评论或直接拒绝。写论文引用其他学者的研究，可以作为提高文章可信度的论证，但超过一定限度，就会出现重复率的问题。论文检查率直接反映了作者的学术态度，因此一般期刊更注重检查率。
王应宽Wang Yingkuan2011-07-23Beijing， China因为同时在运作3本国际英文刊（IJABE， IAEJ， CIGR Journal），论文同行评审的专家来自世界各地。每次收到的评审意见千差万别，而且不同国家或地区的专家的评审意见呈现一定的规律性，随即不由得做些比较。比较得出的基本结论是：欧美国家专家的评审意见详尽具有更大参考价值，台湾地区的同行评审专家次之，大陆专家的评审意见最为简省。文后附上几篇评审意见（所列大陆专家评审意见还是相对较好的），看看便知，一目了然。我曾与编辑同行讨论关于国内专家审稿的问题。共同的见解是，一线一流的专家基本不审稿。若应邀审稿，要么直接拒审，要么敷衍几句了事；比较认真的专家大都让其所指导的研究生代为评审论文。不论让谁审，最后的评审意见与国外专家的评审相比总不令人满意，存在较大的差距。国外专家评审论文大都是义务劳动，没有任何报酬。但专家们认为自己作为科研人员是科学共同体中的一分子，有义务担任同行专家为他人研究成果的学术质量把关。自己为别人的论文评审把关付出了智慧和劳动，别人也会为自己的研究和论文评审把关，也会付出相应的劳动。专家之间相互协作，相互帮助，虽然没有评审报酬，但大家都觉得平等。而且，国外的专家大都言行一致，故能认真地做好每一篇文章的评审工作。有的评审意见详尽的令人赞叹、钦佩和感动。因此，大家看到他们的评审意见都非常详尽而具有参考价值。而国内的专家评审论文为何大都仓促应付，三言两语，或言之无物，或毫无参考价值？主要原因是一线一流的专家都太“忙”，以至忙得都没时间做学术了。据我从事学术期刊工作十多年的经历，不论评审中文文章还是英文文章，国内专家评审意见普遍简单，评审的质量不高，不但看不出有改观的迹象，还有进一步恶化的趋势。文章中存在的很多的问题，专家审后没有看出来或没有指出来。如果直接发表，错误或疏漏太多影响论文的质量和期刊的声誉。在外审专家靠不住时，就要依靠内审做些完善和提高。如果外审专家把不好关，编辑部又无能力通过内审把关，发表出来的论文的质量也就可想而知了。是否国内专家不擅长评审论文呢？非也。据了解，许多国内专家被国外知名期刊邀请审稿时，他们非常积极认真地评审论文，并在规定时间返回颇有水准的评审意见。据说他们也能做得与欧美国际同行专家一样好。可见，国内专家评不好国内期刊论文不是水平问题，而是态度问题，“时间”问题，或者有其他方面的原因。同行评审是学术期刊论文质量把关的重要途径。如果大家都不在乎，把严肃认真的“盲审”变成“瞎审”，学术危矣！国内期刊请国内专家评审论文大都支付审稿费的。当然，限于各期刊的经济困难，审稿费报酬普遍都不高。因此，同行专家大都不很在乎那点可怜的审稿费。如果评审不好文章会影响专家的声誉和公信度。国内特别是大陆的专家既不在乎钱，也不在乎自己的声誉，不知道他们究竟在乎啥？中国是雷锋诞生的国度，按理说，当志愿者做公益应该很有基础。但在学术圈，就拿国内外同行专家无私奉献评审论文作比较，中国的同行专家做的还很不够，需要好好向国际同行学习。附：CIGR Journal栏目主编加拿大专家对一篇退稿文章的评审意见June 27， 2011Dear P H L L:Re: CIGR Manuscript 1911 EFFECTS OF TRACTOR INFLATION PRESSURE AND TRAFFIC ON SOIL PHYSICAL PROPERTIESAs CIGR section editor， I have conducted a preliminary review of the above The manuscript addresses a significant engineering problem in agricultural crop production， and as such， the subject matter is of interest to CIGRHowever， the manuscript is deficient in several scientific The decision is to decline the manuscript without peer My preliminary review is attached to the end of this Please note that the preliminary review is by no means a comprehensive The manuscript is released， and you are free to submit it for publication in another Thank you for considering CIGR for publication of your work and I wish you success in getting your work SincerelyPE， PD，CIGR Section III editor，Research Scientist， Agricultural Engineering，Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada，Section Editor ReviewTitle: EFFECTS OF TRACTOR INFLATION PRESSURE AND TRAFFIC ON SOIL PHYSICAL PROPERTIESCIGR # 1911Authors:H L L et June 27， 2011General:The manuscript addresses soil compaction by multiple passes with agricultural machinery which is a timely topic and of importance to sustainable agricultural There are numerous grammatical errors although the meaning is generally It is strongly recommended that the authors seek the assistance of someone well versed in English to help with the The manuscript is not acceptable in its present It needs a lot of The biggest problem with the manuscript is that key pieces of information are not given， and that the data analysis is not Some of the major deficiencies are listed below although this is by no means an exhaustive Soil It is well known that soil characteristics have a huge influence on soil The only description given is that the soil was a sandy Things like soil series， percent sand， silt and clay， soil organic matter all influence compaction and need to be Tractor specifications: Total tractor weight， tractor axle (or wheel) weights， are critical pieces of information required for compaction studies， but they are not Tire pressure was given， but no information was given on whether these pressures were the same for front and rear Often， tractor manufacturers recommend different pressures for front and rear tires， particularly on tractors with different sizes of front and rear Slip was measured， but there was no mention made of whether the tractor was free wheeling (no implement draft) or whether it was pulling a The drawbar load on a tractor has a huge effect on wheel slip， and must be It was mentioned that a 4WD tractor was used， and different tire sizes were given for front and rear tires which implies that it was a front wheel It needs to be specified whether or not the front wheel drive was Results: A randomized complete block statistical design with three replicates was However， the results are given in a series of tables with simple means with no statistical The results need to be subjected to appropriate statistical analysis， ANOVA or multiple regression analysis， and appropriate post hoc tests applied to determine which means are statistically different from each The experimental design employed lends itself to standard statistical analysis of the Graphs should be used when appropriate to help illustrate the data and the Table 1， 2 and 3 and Cone index has wrong Cone index is normally given in MPa or kPAlso， the values for cone index are much lower than normally Section 3It is not necessary to list all of the equipment used such as oven， air compressor， All you need to say is that samples were oven dried at 105�0�2 C for soil moisture Things like air compressor and pressure gauge are every day shop equipment， are understood to be necessary for any type of experiment where inflation pressures are However， things like the penetrometer， and shear vane meter should be These are specialized pieces of equipment and their performance can affect the Section Need to provide information on which soil cone penetrometer you Also， how many penetrometer measurements per plot per pass?3)In Figure 4， the text “USB Connection” was overlapped by the 4)In Figure 4， the line with the “Information Collection” is missing an 5)In Figure 7， the text “field identifying number” was covered by the 6)In Figure 8， some texts are placed out of the 7)Please use consistent fonts in figures throughout the Confidential Comments to Associate Editor/Division Editor/Editor-in-chiefI recommend the authors should use consistent fonts throughout the The paper cannot be accepted in its present 中国大陆专家1评审论文意见Section III: CommentsThis section is the most valuable part of the review for the author(s)， who are extremely interested in how you formed your opinion of this Please provide specific comments that will help the author(s) understand your review， and possibly prepare a Use all the space you General Comments:This paper assess the O2 consumption rate and the CO2 evolution rate in tomato pomace treated with Pleurotus ostreatus without and with Mn to determine if peak colonization rate (for heightened delignification) was delayed by Generally speaking， the author’s work is useful and The author gives a brief introduction to the related work and compares his ideas to The theoretical analysis of this article is In all， this manuscript has good novelty and strong technical strength， I’m looking forward the results of further investigations on this Specific comments:In Table 1， notes are not enough in this In the Results and Discussion， results have been detailed explained， but some theoretical analysis of the experimental data are not Confidential Comments to Associate Editor/Division EditorI hope the paper will be published to guide more Reviewers’ information (Blind to Authors)中国大陆专家2评审论文意见(相对而言属于国内专家评审较为认真仔细的了)Section III: CommentsThis section is the most valuable part of the review for the author(s)， who are extremely interested in how you formed your opinion of this Please provide specific comments that will help the author(s) understand your review， and possibly prepare a Use all the space you General Comments:Variable Spray will play an important role in saving resources， protecting environment， raising quality of agricultural The purpose of this paper is to evaluate PWM-based continuous variable spray in terms of spray distribution pattern， spray droplet size， and spray angle for flat-fan， hollow-cone and solid-cone The test design， results， analysis and conclusion are After re-review， this paper may be published， I Specific comments:(1)I have read a paper named “Variable rate Continuous Spray Equipment Based on PWM Technology and Its Spray Characteristics”， which was published in Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery， 2008， 39 (6): 77-80 (in Chinese)”(see the attachment)， I think that is a previous study work of the If that is correct， I suggest the author adding that paper in the references of this And then， the contents which have been described in the previous paper can be deleted from this (2)In the abstract “The sensitivities of the spray angles to flow-rate are 8254o/%、6681o/%、5761o/% respectively for flat-fan， the hollow-cone and the solid-cone nozzles” In English， without the symbol “、”(3)The numerical data in the conclusion are not the same as those in the abstract”Confidential Comments to Associate Editor/Division EditorReviewers’ information (Blind to Authors)中国大陆专家3评审论文意见Section III: CommentsThis section is the most valuable part of the review for the author(s)， who are extremely interested in how you formed your opinion of this Please provide specific comments that will help the author(s) understand your review， and possibly prepare a Use all the space you General Comments:This paper is more important， but it still needs major revision requiring re-Specific comments:Revision suggestions of this paper: The study results and conclusions should be clarified in It should be described clearly about the data and size of NACA0015 airfoil which was selected in the numerical simulation in section It should be described clearly about the specific quantitative conditions of icing in section This paper is required re-review after Confidential Comments to Associate Editor/Division Editor
不修改的话，第2次的话可以去尝试一下，如果还不够的话，肯定你是存在什么问题，这个时候就应该引起重视和注意。
期刊论文专家评审和写作意图不一致的原因分析
王应宽Wang Yingkuan2011-07-23Beijing， China因为同时在运作3本国际英文刊（IJABE， IAEJ， CIGR Journal），论文同行评审的专家来自世界各地。每次收到的评审意见千差万别，而且不同国家或地区的专家的评审意见呈现一定的规律性，随即不由得做些比较。比较得出的基本结论是：欧美国家专家的评审意见详尽具有更大参考价值，台湾地区的同行评审专家次之，大陆专家的评审意见最为简省。文后附上几篇评审意见（所列大陆专家评审意见还是相对较好的），看看便知，一目了然。我曾与编辑同行讨论关于国内专家审稿的问题。共同的见解是，一线一流的专家基本不审稿。若应邀审稿，要么直接拒审，要么敷衍几句了事；比较认真的专家大都让其所指导的研究生代为评审论文。不论让谁审，最后的评审意见与国外专家的评审相比总不令人满意，存在较大的差距。国外专家评审论文大都是义务劳动，没有任何报酬。但专家们认为自己作为科研人员是科学共同体中的一分子，有义务担任同行专家为他人研究成果的学术质量把关。自己为别人的论文评审把关付出了智慧和劳动，别人也会为自己的研究和论文评审把关，也会付出相应的劳动。专家之间相互协作，相互帮助，虽然没有评审报酬，但大家都觉得平等。而且，国外的专家大都言行一致，故能认真地做好每一篇文章的评审工作。有的评审意见详尽的令人赞叹、钦佩和感动。因此，大家看到他们的评审意见都非常详尽而具有参考价值。而国内的专家评审论文为何大都仓促应付，三言两语，或言之无物，或毫无参考价值？主要原因是一线一流的专家都太“忙”，以至忙得都没时间做学术了。据我从事学术期刊工作十多年的经历，不论评审中文文章还是英文文章，国内专家评审意见普遍简单，评审的质量不高，不但看不出有改观的迹象，还有进一步恶化的趋势。文章中存在的很多的问题，专家审后没有看出来或没有指出来。如果直接发表，错误或疏漏太多影响论文的质量和期刊的声誉。在外审专家靠不住时，就要依靠内审做些完善和提高。如果外审专家把不好关，编辑部又无能力通过内审把关，发表出来的论文的质量也就可想而知了。是否国内专家不擅长评审论文呢？非也。据了解，许多国内专家被国外知名期刊邀请审稿时，他们非常积极认真地评审论文，并在规定时间返回颇有水准的评审意见。据说他们也能做得与欧美国际同行专家一样好。可见，国内专家评不好国内期刊论文不是水平问题，而是态度问题，“时间”问题，或者有其他方面的原因。同行评审是学术期刊论文质量把关的重要途径。如果大家都不在乎，把严肃认真的“盲审”变成“瞎审”，学术危矣！国内期刊请国内专家评审论文大都支付审稿费的。当然，限于各期刊的经济困难，审稿费报酬普遍都不高。因此，同行专家大都不很在乎那点可怜的审稿费。如果评审不好文章会影响专家的声誉和公信度。国内特别是大陆的专家既不在乎钱，也不在乎自己的声誉，不知道他们究竟在乎啥？中国是雷锋诞生的国度，按理说，当志愿者做公益应该很有基础。但在学术圈，就拿国内外同行专家无私奉献评审论文作比较，中国的同行专家做的还很不够，需要好好向国际同行学习。附：CIGR Journal栏目主编加拿大专家对一篇退稿文章的评审意见June 27， 2011Dear P H L L:Re: CIGR Manuscript 1911 EFFECTS OF TRACTOR INFLATION PRESSURE AND TRAFFIC ON SOIL PHYSICAL PROPERTIESAs CIGR section editor， I have conducted a preliminary review of the above The manuscript addresses a significant engineering problem in agricultural crop production， and as such， the subject matter is of interest to CIGRHowever， the manuscript is deficient in several scientific The decision is to decline the manuscript without peer My preliminary review is attached to the end of this Please note that the preliminary review is by no means a comprehensive The manuscript is released， and you are free to submit it for publication in another Thank you for considering CIGR for publication of your work and I wish you success in getting your work SincerelyPE， PD，CIGR Section III editor，Research Scientist， Agricultural Engineering，Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada，Section Editor ReviewTitle: EFFECTS OF TRACTOR INFLATION PRESSURE AND TRAFFIC ON SOIL PHYSICAL PROPERTIESCIGR # 1911Authors:H L L et June 27， 2011General:The manuscript addresses soil compaction by multiple passes with agricultural machinery which is a timely topic and of importance to sustainable agricultural There are numerous grammatical errors although the meaning is generally It is strongly recommended that the authors seek the assistance of someone well versed in English to help with the The manuscript is not acceptable in its present It needs a lot of The biggest problem with the manuscript is that key pieces of information are not given， and that the data analysis is not Some of the major deficiencies are listed below although this is by no means an exhaustive Soil It is well known that soil characteristics have a huge influence on soil The only description given is that the soil was a sandy Things like soil series， percent sand， silt and clay， soil organic matter all influence compaction and need to be Tractor specifications: Total tractor weight， tractor axle (or wheel) weights， are critical pieces of information required for compaction studies， but they are not Tire pressure was given， but no information was given on whether these pressures were the same for front and rear Often， tractor manufacturers recommend different pressures for front and rear tires， particularly on tractors with different sizes of front and rear Slip was measured， but there was no mention made of whether the tractor was free wheeling (no implement draft) or whether it was pulling a The drawbar load on a tractor has a huge effect on wheel slip， and must be It was mentioned that a 4WD tractor was used， and different tire sizes were given for front and rear tires which implies that it was a front wheel It needs to be specified whether or not the front wheel drive was Results: A randomized complete block statistical design with three replicates was However， the results are given in a series of tables with simple means with no statistical The results need to be subjected to appropriate statistical analysis， ANOVA or multiple regression analysis， and appropriate post hoc tests applied to determine which means are statistically different from each The experimental design employed lends itself to standard statistical analysis of the Graphs should be used when appropriate to help illustrate the data and the Table 1， 2 and 3 and Cone index has wrong Cone index is normally given in MPa or kPAlso， the values for cone index are much lower than normally Section 3It is not necessary to list all of the equipment used such as oven， air compressor， All you need to say is that samples were oven dried at 105�0�2 C for soil moisture Things like air compressor and pressure gauge are every day shop equipment， are understood to be necessary for any type of experiment where inflation pressures are However， things like the penetrometer， and shear vane meter should be These are specialized pieces of equipment and their performance can affect the Section Need to provide information on which soil cone penetrometer you Also， how many penetrometer measurements per plot per pass?3)In Figure 4， the text “USB Connection” was overlapped by the 4)In Figure 4， the line with the “Information Collection” is missing an 5)In Figure 7， the text “field identifying number” was covered by the 6)In Figure 8， some texts are placed out of the 7)Please use consistent fonts in figures throughout the Confidential Comments to Associate Editor/Division Editor/Editor-in-chiefI recommend the authors should use consistent fonts throughout the The paper cannot be accepted in its present 中国大陆专家1评审论文意见Section III: CommentsThis section is the most valuable part of the review for the author(s)， who are extremely interested in how you formed your opinion of this Please provide specific comments that will help the author(s) understand your review， and possibly prepare a Use all the space you General Comments:This paper assess the O2 consumption rate and the CO2 evolution rate in tomato pomace treated with Pleurotus ostreatus without and with Mn to determine if peak colonization rate (for heightened delignification) was delayed by Generally speaking， the author’s work is useful and The author gives a brief introduction to the related work and compares his ideas to The theoretical analysis of this article is In all， this manuscript has good novelty and strong technical strength， I’m looking forward the results of further investigations on this Specific comments:In Table 1， notes are not enough in this In the Results and Discussion， results have been detailed explained， but some theoretical analysis of the experimental data are not Confidential Comments to Associate Editor/Division EditorI hope the paper will be published to guide more Reviewers’ information (Blind to Authors)中国大陆专家2评审论文意见(相对而言属于国内专家评审较为认真仔细的了)Section III: CommentsThis section is the most valuable part of the review for the author(s)， who are extremely interested in how you formed your opinion of this Please provide specific comments that will help the author(s) understand your review， and possibly prepare a Use all the space you General Comments:Variable Spray will play an important role in saving resources， protecting environment， raising quality of agricultural The purpose of this paper is to evaluate PWM-based continuous variable spray in terms of spray distribution pattern， spray droplet size， and spray angle for flat-fan， hollow-cone and solid-cone The test design， results， analysis and conclusion are After re-review， this paper may be published， I Specific comments:(1)I have read a paper named “Variable rate Continuous Spray Equipment Based on PWM Technology and Its Spray Characteristics”， which was published in Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery， 2008， 39 (6): 77-80 (in Chinese)”(see the attachment)， I think that is a previous study work of the If that is correct， I suggest the author adding that paper in the references of this And then， the contents which have been described in the previous paper can be deleted from this (2)In the abstract “The sensitivities of the spray angles to flow-rate are 8254o/%、6681o/%、5761o/% respectively for flat-fan， the hollow-cone and the solid-cone nozzles” In English， without the symbol “、”(3)The numerical data in the conclusion are not the same as those in the abstract”Confidential Comments to Associate Editor/Division EditorReviewers’ information (Blind to Authors)中国大陆专家3评审论文意见Section III: CommentsThis section is the most valuable part of the review for the author(s)， who are extremely interested in how you formed your opinion of this Please provide specific comments that will help the author(s) understand your review， and possibly prepare a Use all the space you General Comments:This paper is more important， but it still needs major revision requiring re-Specific comments:Revision suggestions of this paper: The study results and conclusions should be clarified in It should be described clearly about the data and size of NACA0015 airfoil which was selected in the numerical simulation in section It should be described clearly about the specific quantitative conditions of icing in section This paper is required re-review after Confidential Comments to Associate Editor/Division Editor
有利于及时调整，避免大返工。在毕业论文的研究和写作过程中，作者的思维活动是非常活跃的，一些不起眼的材料，从表面看来不相关的材料，经过熟悉和深思，常常会产生新的联想或新的观点，如果不认真编写提纲，动起笔来就会被这种现象所干扰，不得不停下笔来重新思考，甚至推翻已写的从头来过;这样，不仅增加了工作量，也会极大地影响写作情绪。毕业论文提纲犹如工程的蓝图，只要动笔前把提纲考虑得周到严谨，多花点时间和力气，搞得扎实一些，就能形成一个层次清楚、逻辑严密的论文框架，从而避免许多不必要的返工。另外，初写论文的学生，如果把自己的思路先写成提纲，再去请教他人，人家一看能懂，较易提出一些修改补充的意见，便于自己得到有效的指导。
有些刊物印的是刊期的月份，而杂志本身是旬刊之类的，所以知网上是显示刊期数。只要是正规期刊，一般都是没有问题的，有样刊，要知网检索页，有您的姓名和单位名称，这能对上，就没有问题
期刊论文专家评审和写作意图不一致的原因是什么
核心期刊比较难安排，然后需要看您发什么类型的还有您的文章如何等等审核。比如现在想发排版基本都是明年的，价格是1到3万不等看您发的内容。国家级期刊的话，医学的2000-5000左右畜牧的1000度化工的1500左右教育的1000左右。不同的杂志价格也不同具体的要看您发什么文章。壹 品 优编辑征稿，有需要自行了解。
在这我先给你说流程让你熟悉一下 要准备好自己的文章，其次需要找到自己要发的期刊，然后联系中介 或者杂志社进行投稿！文章通过审核后，排版出刊！ 以上整个流程是这样滴。需要找中间平台代发的话 建议找淘宝第三方交易的 进行操作 这样比较安全 例如像我这样的 嘿嘿
想要快快速发表，就是找一个代发机构找一个机构不难，注意以下几点就可以了，找谁都一样，自己判断好了第一，先考虑你发表论文的用途，评中职，还是高职。中职一般发表省级以上就可以，高职就需要有国家级的了，甚至核心期刊。毕业论文的话，还是根据学校的要求了。第二，考虑价格方面，省级 国家级 核心价格都不一样，但是咱们也不能一再追求低价格，网上假刊太多，小心占小便宜吃大亏，被骗了几百快无所谓，主要是耽搁了事情，评职称一年就一次第三，时间问题，刊物确定好了 一定要确定下（新闻出版总署）是否能查到。然后就是时间，一般杂志从定稿到出刊都得需要1个月，赶上高峰期3月都有可能，如果对方什么都答应你，今天给稿子明天邮递给你刊物，这个肯定是假刊的。第四，价格方面，这个不好说，杂志种类太多，没法完全根据省级 国家级来判断价格，核心期刊的话 悬殊很大。最后祝你成功，这是我发表论文的经验，我帮我同事也发表了一些，希望对你有所帮助。．如果是从相关书籍上摘下来的原话，但是此话已经被数据库中的相关文献也抄了进去，也就是说前面的文章也从相关书籍上摘了相同的话，但是我的论文中标注的这段话来自相关的书籍，这个算不算学术抄袭？ 检测系统不下结论，是不是抄袭最后还有人工审查这一关，所以，如果是您描述的这种情况，专家会有相应判断。我们的系统只是提供各种线索和依据，让人能够快速掌握检测文献的信息4．最小检测单位是句子，那么在每句话里改动一两个字就检测不出来了么？ 我们对句子也有相应的处理，有一个句子相似性的算法。并不是句子完全一样才判断为相同。句子有句子级的相似算法，段落有段落级的相似算法，计算一篇文献，一段话是否与其他文献文字相似，是在此基础上综合得出的。5．如果是从相关书籍上摘下来的原话，但是此话已经被数据库中的相关文献也抄了进去，也就是说前面的文章也从相关书籍上摘了相同的话，但是我的论文中标注的这段话来自相关的书籍，这个算不算学术抄袭？ 检测系统不下结论，是不是抄袭最后还有人工审查这一关，所以，如果是您描述的这种情况，专家会有相应判断。我们的系统只是提供各种线索和依据，让人能够快速掌握检测文献的信息。6．知网检测系统的权威性？ 学术不端文献检测系统并不下结论，即检测系统并不对检测文献定性，只是将检测文献中与其他已发表文献中的雷同部分陈列出来，列出客观事实，而这篇检测文献是否属于学术不端，需专家做最后的审查确认。1、论文题目：要求准确、简练、醒目、新颖。 2、目录：目录是论文中主要段落的简表。（短篇论文不必列目录） 3、提要：是文章主要内容的摘录，要求短、精、完整。字数少可几十字，多不超过三百字为宜。 4、关键词或主题词：关键词是从论文的题名、提要和正文中选取出来的，是对表述论文的中心内容有实质意义的词汇。关键词是用作机系统标引论文内容特征的词语，便于信息系统汇集，以供读者检索。每篇论文一般选取3-8个词汇作为关键词，另起一行，排在“提要”的左下方。 主题词是经过规范化的词，在确定主题词时，要对论文进行主题，依照标引和组配规则转换成主题词表中的规范词语。 5、论文正文： （1）引言：引言又称前言、序言和导言，用在论文的开头。 引言一般要概括地写出作者意图，说明选题的目的和意义， 并指出论文写作的范围。引言要短小精悍、紧扣主题。 〈2）论文正文：正文是论文的主体，正文应包括论点、论据、 论证过程和结论。主体部分包括以下内容： 提出-论点； 分析问题-论据和论证； 解决问题-论证与步骤； 结论。 6、一篇论文的参考文献是将论文在和写作中可参考或引证的主要文献资料，列于论文的末尾。参考文献应另起一页，标注方式按《GB7714-87文后参考文献著录规则》进行。 中文：标题--作者--出版物信息（版地、版者、版期）：作者--标题--出版物信息 所列参考文献的要求是： （1）所列参考文献应是正式出版物，以便读者考证。 （2）所列举的参考文献要标明序号、著作或文章的标题、作者、出版物信息。
正规不正规？级别够不够？ 发文章之前都要搞清楚啊
期刊论文专家评审和写作意图不一致的原因有哪些
有些刊物印的是刊期的月份，而杂志本身是旬刊之类的，所以知网上是显示刊期数。只要是正规期刊，一般都是没有问题的，有样刊，要知网检索页，有您的姓名和单位名称，这能对上，就没有问题
写的不够完整，写的没有实际感
1、期刊不符合要求需要选择正规的期刊进行投稿投稿，所谓正规的期刊也就是说：他们必须具备双刊号（国际刊号与国内刊号）缺一不可，而且你选择的期刊一定要符合自己撰写论文的类型。例如农业类的论文，我们就需要选择农业类的期刊进行投稿，如果你去医学类的期刊进行投稿那就有点期刊本身的要要求了。2、论文格式不符合期刊论文的格式涉及题目、摘要、关键词和正文内容，作者在撰写期刊论文之前，需要了解期刊的相关要求。部分出版社对论文版面收取费用，在论文字数满足要求时，应合理安排论文篇幅长短，以避免增加论文投稿的成本。论文格式的每个环节都非常重要，也许一个小细节会导致论文被否决，所以我们应该做好准备。3、论文内容抄袭率论文最忌讳的就是抄袭，出版社都会对来稿的论文进行查重，只有投稿的论文高于出版社要求的重复率，也会被拒的。
论文投稿被拒绝肯定是没有达到别人的标准，要么是品质问题，要么是同类型的太多。
期刊论文专家评审和写作意图不一致会怎么样
有利于及时调整，避免大返工。在毕业论文的研究和写作过程中，作者的思维活动是非常活跃的，一些不起眼的材料，从表面看来不相关的材料，经过熟悉和深思，常常会产生新的联想或新的观点，如果不认真编写提纲，动起笔来就会被这种现象所干扰，不得不停下笔来重新思考，甚至推翻已写的从头来过;这样，不仅增加了工作量，也会极大地影响写作情绪。毕业论文提纲犹如工程的蓝图，只要动笔前把提纲考虑得周到严谨，多花点时间和力气，搞得扎实一些，就能形成一个层次清楚、逻辑严密的论文框架，从而避免许多不必要的返工。另外，初写论文的学生，如果把自己的思路先写成提纲，再去请教他人，人家一看能懂，较易提出一些修改补充的意见，便于自己得到有效的指导。
要看你第2次论文修改的效果，如果你是本科生的话，大多数老师对于论文内容的质量要求都不高，只要听着老师的意见，认认真真的把需要修改的地方修改之后就一定能通过的，但是千万不能不改或者潦草改，因为这样会让老师认识到你态度不端正的态度，那么你就危险了。
不修改的话，第2次的话可以去尝试一下，如果还不够的话，肯定你是存在什么问题，这个时候就应该引起重视和注意。
我认为第1审不能过的话，第2审过的可能性就比较小，如果不能及时修改自己的论文话，就会引发第2次的意见讨论，这种时候不能过的可能性就非常的大。