学术论文百科

法律英语论文研究方向选题意义怎么填

发布时间:2024-07-03 16:03:27

法律英语论文研究方向选题意义怎么填

选题意义和目的一般作为开题报告里面的第一块内容,是阐述你所研究的这个选题有没有研究价值或者说讨论价值的, 写开题报告的目的,其实就是要请导师来评判我们这个选题有没有研究价值、这个研究方法有没有可能奏效、这个论证逻辑有没有明显缺陷 写意义的时候根据你的选题来决定形式可以分现实意义和理论意义也可以不细分,把目的和意义和在一起写,总之突出你观点的新颖和重要性即可建议可以从这两点来叙述,不过要根据自己的选题,不要生搬硬套: (你的选题)是前人没有研究过的,也就是说研究领域中一个新颖有意义的课题,被前人所忽略的 前人有研究过,或者说阐述过但是没有阐述论证的足够全面,你加以丰满,或者驳斥前人的观点,总之,意义和目的一定要叙述的清晰并且是有一定新意的其次注意自己所使用的理论,你是用什么理论证明你的观点也要叙述清楚,否则难以有说服力在做文献综述和国内外研究水平的评价等等也要有翔实的根据这样才能衬托出你的选题的意义所在

回答 根据自己的专业方向填写就可以了我的理解是,研究方向,是技术专业背景下,比较具体的研究主题。1、了解自己感兴趣的课题能够研究自己感兴趣的内容是一件很幸运的事情。日常学习与翻阅专业文献,可以帮助你更好地找到自己的兴趣点。有了感兴趣的内容,就要付之实践。首先是查找相关资料,通过知网等工具可以轻松地检索到自己感兴趣内容的相关文献,当然还可以通过百度、谷歌等浏览器以及图书馆等社会资源下载所需文献。有了详细的了解之后,再考虑是否要进行更深层次的研究。 2、明确导师的研究方向了解导师制定的研究方向和预期目标是确定研究内容的又一行之有效的方法。首先,应当详细地了解导师的研究方向。其次,如果是导师给出的研究方向,那么一般是可行的;这时我们就要积极与导师沟通,了解导师对于该课题的想法;在进行充分、有效地交流之后,我们就要对导师提出的建议进行认真考虑,可行度较高的话,就可以着手开始搜集资料,为论文完成打好基础。3、确定研究思路和计划“书读百遍,其义自见”,通过与导师、学长学姐的沟通,我们可能会对这个课题有一定新的认识,确定了研究方向之后,就要对近几年的文献进行更深的了解。精读和泛读相结合,同时对论文的主要观点、论证方式进行记录,同时要进行思考研究课题目前存在的问题以及需要改进的地方,形成一个完整的研究计划。

你的专业啊。是研究生的专业。例如对于一张脸高中是整张脸 大学是半张脸 研究生是一个鼻子。对于研究生来说这个鼻子就是研究方向 。

就是你挑选自己感兴趣的方向,查询很多的资料,进行广泛的了解,查一些新的文献,了解一下这个研究方向的最新进展。你的方向要结合最新的进展和研究热点,思路要清晰,研究方法要有创新性,凡事都是越新越好,当然,要立足于你们的实际条件。

法律英语论文研究方向选题意义

题目:With regard to criminal law theory in the understanding of a flagrant crime正文:Flagrant crime as a general social phenomenon, has been in existence for thousands of years of social history; including, in particular the concept of school as a flagrant crime committed, it can be said with the general sense of the crime have simultaneously; the concept of criminal law as a flagrant offense, has historically existed in thousands of human Openly committed as a criminal and the negative cultural expressions, whether it is the specificity of the Criminal Code norms on moral values or the reverse, and are worthy of criminal law theory researchers to explore in However, for a long time, China's Criminal Law刑法理论界on the "objective elements constitute a crime," the study focus, multi-objective aspects of running an essential element, that is against the act, against the findings and results of behavior and the causal relationship between on; for the crime as an objective choice of the implementation of elements of the crime the way, but rarely get In this paper, exploring a flagrant crime, not only confined to the study of criminal law perspective, but also learn from the crime, ethics, sociology, such as the perspective of the norms of a flagrant offense, the nature of black social evil, the negative value and its comprehensive evaluation Author惟愿through so many levels, multi-angle discussion to a more deepening and comprehensive three-dimensional interpretation that the truth will be openly committed to maximize the show in the face of social and readers, so expect it to for the development of China's Criminal Jurisprudence criminal applications of the research on the subject domain, to make its own modest 摘要的英文是:Abstract关键词是:Key words内容是:Flagrant;Flagrant crime

The theory of criminal law of shallow understanding irrtumslehreLegal irrtumslehre, namely, refers to the illegality mistake for own behavior in law, whether what crime constitutes a crime shall be punished by, or what is wrong, is to oneself the legal nature of the action of meaning or Legal irrtumslehre usually includes three conditions: (1) the actor's behavior in law does not constitute a crime, the offender and constitutes a crime for which imaginary guilty, (2) the behavior in law constitutes a crime and does not constitute a crime, the offender mistaken assumptions that innocent, (3) for his act constitutes a crime shall be convicted and punishment in light of the existing errors, misunderstanding or Due to the legal irrtumslehre, only to the behavior of the offender is not correct understanding of the legal assessment, and for their actions in fact correct understanding of the situation is still there, so its act constitutes a crime shall be investigated for criminal responsibility is and how it is not usually (1)Imaginary innocent treatment principleThe principles for imaginary innocence, whether it involves a deliberately Foreign criminal law theory basically has the following kinds:1)Should know that don't speak, just for criminal facts have Canada criminal code article 19 regulation: "the ignorance of the law excuses and crime can be ShuZui " Motto: "Roman law and legal disclaimer" somehow also expressed a principle, namely: "in the crime as subjective FanYi established condition, not request to recognize his behavior of richtswitrig"2)Should know the reason, according to two: moral responsibility theory, personality responsibility Moral responsibility theory emphasizes on the rationality of free will blame illegal conduct, is considered to be objective 3)That said, the possible illegality of responsibility for deliberately, at least to the possibility of understanding While in China mainland, the introduction of the concept of crime has another concept -- social consciousness that harm to discuss richtswitrig already Because the deliberate crime according to law condemn the illegality of the offender is not known, the law itself is not damaged, the law of the social consciousness is Social harm consciousness is the essential contents of the crime, illegal consciousness is the legal form of social Therefore, our country law more emphasis is on the rationality of essence, which is harmful to the society Just because of its social harmfulness, with a social moral evaluation colour, easier for people to grasp and Therefore, the author thinks that, in general, the person need to recognize his behavior may be the result of inevitable or harmful to the society, and has already With intentionally But in fact, the forbidden by law and mass that is harmful to the society in our country nowadays the behavior under the constitution should be consistent, in other words, know the social harmfulness also know the possibility of illegal, but know the possibility of illegal is inevitable should also realize social harmfulness, both are Therefore, it is generally thought that the law is no excuse, the reason of law does not exclude the misunderstanding in principle, but can be culpable for deliberately (2) Misunderstandings treatment PunishmentWe might as well so the essence of blame for his due: the crime in the subjective should blame or blame, for the intent or negligence If the offender because of misunderstanding that legal person feels very innocent, lack of this should blame or condemning sexual, from the fundamental measure, blame is absolutely not consider Especially in the modern society, the legal category SAN marino, legal entry in different fields and different levels of books, recognized, comprehend legal apparently endless and same, so the person of law and misunderstandings, not Now, both in theory and practice, the method not cling to forgive "seems to have in Therefore, to a certain extent, can also think admits exceptions excusable is legal misunderstanding of criminal law is an important symbol of In addition, it was not in the act of which is prohibited by the laws and regulations, especially after a circumstance, should have knowledge of richtswitrig actor, constitute the understanding of deliberate point of view, with the attitude of this understanding, of course, that is not the illegality or by the simple statement The author thinks that the only when the legal establishment of may, FangKeZu but The fact mistakeThat mistake, is to determine its subjective behavior nature and the criminal responsibility of the relevant facts wrong From the wrong reasons and phenomenon of angles, generally known that there are several mistakes:(1) Object irrtumslehreThe object is known for errors, whether there is objectively error It includes actor in the implementation of the existing criminal behavior of the hazards for the object and actually does not exist, or for criminal object and actually does not exist, or infringe a criminal object and actually invaded another crime The object of objects is usually known errors caused by mistake, but the object of different social relationship reflects Evil doer of objects and actual expected in fact not only harm object does not agree, and in the nature of law is not Therefore, the object irrtumslehre may affect the form of sin, crime accomplishment, and may even attempted to influence the For example, in view of the circumstances, not a thought before the enemy, and a party came to stick, afterwards just know the ox was A thought of damage is "people", and the actual wounded is "cow", do not belong to the same laws of the Similar situation and will generally be mistaken for drug trafficking items, Actor will stolen items in the theft of guns in stealing This object from the subjective errors, see, is a kind of mistake, From the objective, because the mistake crime to no avail, where the criminal attempted 1)Object mistakeObjects can be generalized mistake, including object mistake to belong to the object know mistake is inevitable object These include, is known to be wrong object of legal property of the same object mistake and legal properties of different objects, namely the object irrtumslehre In order to distinguish with the object mistake here, the cognition to the same object only mean error between the different objects, namely the misunderstanding of the evil doer expected objects and actual harm to the object, but not in fact in the legal nature of the same This object mistake again say things on purpose mistake not criminal As a reserve, killing b shall be killed as b and c, do not affect a This is the need to consider that a kill b behavior "mistake" cause others (c), belong to an intentional crime (b) "death", for the excess result, according to the results, which determine the ordinary mail of death was deliberately recognized for deliberately, to the death of the fault is propylene, identified as negligence, according to the intention or negligence of the general mark recognized FanYi or state of mind, not applicable rules of the 2) Behavior irrtumslehreBehavior mainly includes two kind of mistake: first, the behavior nature That actor has to its social harm nature, such as understanding not imaginary Behavior nature mistake might affect the form of sin, and may also affect Second, the behavior tools (methods) That person to use when the conduct of tool (methods), which affects not correct understanding of harm results, behavior tools (methods) mistake can affect crime or attempted was founded, also can affect crime or belongs to the incident, a typical for murder on hazardous substances, because the drug failure and failed to kill people, can think method or tools for error doer of consciousness beyond reason not to And as actor see armour, second coming together, hence shot to play, but can't hit by the party Look, this is from the phenomenon of an object, or the final results for the mistake, but this error is based on the fact that the wrong doer identify offender is carefully identify to begin, can think recognize is accurate, errors in ChaWu The solution to this situation, "said", its legal with qualitative and recognize wrong object is consistent, namely directly recognized as an intentional homicide The death of a person is directly intentionally to b, death is the indirect intentional, just for a to b is attempted, Additionally, if in daily life because misidentification object and damage of consequences, the crime itself is not just any criminal negligence because of 3)Causality irrtumslehreCausality mistake, is on his behavior and harmful results of actual connection between Generally include: first, not some harm result, as has happened This generally constitute a Second, has certain harm result, but not for actor or for his behavior is caused, and does not affect crime Third, really happened, the offender is aware of its behavior, but with the actual development between the harm to the process or a mistake, general to punish crime In theory, the offender is not only a crime, but continuous movement, this several continuous action is not a few crime, but a In this sense, doesn't exist on the results of the Legal irrtumslehre and facts mistake and proceduresDomestic scholars in fact know mistakes and errors between the issue legal representative views mainly include:(1)For own behavior whether in law constitutes a crime, criminal or what kind of criminal punishment shall be under the incorrect understanding is legal irrtumslehre for his behavior on the implementation of the incorrect understanding is the fact that mistake,(2)The objectivity of crime is a false understanding of crime, that mistake of objective facts have clear understanding, only to act in the evaluation of existing laws on the concept of law is not correct mistakes。(3)Actor known facts and actual fact don't agree is wrong, the person that judgment and objective law is law of illegal inconsistency These ideas basically could in theory and legal irrtumslehre fact distinguish mistakes, it is important to emphasize that:1) With the conviction that the so-called irrelevant, as this mistake to hit each other, the shooting head caused the death of heart, without vision of research into 2) Study of the theory of error, error occurs when the purpose, but whether to intentionally resistance, reduce plots affected only the wrong cognition, natural sentencing nor will it into the error theory 3) This does not constitute a crime and actor for crime, and for their behavior in the criminal law on the crimes and how to apply for criminal punishment on such specific knowledge error, conviction according to Based on this, the author thinks that, at the fact that criminal law is only to know wrong doer of elements to know the so-called objective facts constituents of mistake is the fact that the legal irrtumslehre error refers to the legal action is illegal and the evaluation of the From the theory of facts and legal irrtumslehre error, but the problem is in the law, criminal elements to the facts and law closely combined circumstances (like some administrative crimes and economic crimes), or is in a fact itself contains certain laws of evaluation content, to distinguish with a mistake is the fact that mistake or legal wrong, is often If the property of his humanity and obscenity obscenity, administrative rules and regulations, JinYuOu, disrupt public until its precondition of the legitimacy of the public, and legal irrtumslehre facts wrong intertwined, and this is what we distinguish facts and legal irrtumslehre errors will solve the In some cases, the defendant should know that because of the lack of knowledge, and not to the behavior of social harmfulness, so that the defendant is not "knowledge they will entail harmful consequences to society, and hope or allows such results" and deliberate crime, the burden of proof is only FanYi prosecution, in addition, prosecution without proof the defendant not normal, but normal mental and spiritual normal presumption defendant directly if the defendant that his spirit is not normal, it shall provide necessary evidence by himself to Thus, the author, on legal irrtumslehre processing, can adopt the presumption of ways to Which country presumption every normal citizens are known, unless the law can put forward defense "advantage prove" above, or the evidence rebut these presumption is From the efficiency of lawsuit, said the country is impossible to prove the defendant is known of the

现在准备考研已经晚了,如果你有天赋的话,可以尝试,不是很乐观。不管做什么工作,口语还是第一位的。公司法、合同法,对于没有基础的人来说,还是有点难度。有些地方不好懂。如果对法律感兴趣,建议你还是考司法考试吧,涉外律师还是很赚钱的哦。我本人就是英语专业的,过了八级,也想考研来着,但我最后选择了考司考,过了。

1、口语很重要,但不是唯一因素。我的老师本科专业是英语,研究生学国际经济法,很成功。现在法律行业很缺少这类人才。2、具备法律基础知识是必须的。不过不用担心,法律虽然很抽象,但还是比较好学的,只要努力,一切困难都会克服。3、建议多看教材,特别是指定的教材,另外多做多看西政的法律历年考研真题,先找感觉,感觉对了,事情就容易多了。

法律英语论文研究方向选题意义怎么写

回答 亲,可写以下几点,中药制药纯化水消毒的过程和方法,在用科学表明该方法作用,最后该选题的重点内容总结 亲,你要明白论文的作用是什么,理由是最好找的,比如你看到与选题中观点一致或相反的资料、事例引发的思考,或者是由于所研究的内容具有明确的理论价值和实践意义,最后提出自己的观点。 亲,你要明白论文的作用是什么,理由是最好找的,比如你看到与选题中观点一致或相反的资料、事例引发的思考,或者是由于所研究的内容具有明确的理论价值和实践意义,最后提出自己的观点。 选题理由要从观点的由来和研究历程着手,提出论文是对以往研究的总结还是创新,并且研究有利于完善或是明确这一观点,而且可以指导实践,既有理论价值又有实践意义。 我简单说一个理由,比如“中药制药纯化水系统是怎样消毒杀菌微生物的, 更多3条 

我是上海某高校的硕士毕业生,我来说说我的建议~理论意义:是说你的论文对你研究的方向的理论做了哪些补充、拓展或者创新~(举个例子:假如你研究的课题是“泰剧的成功原因对国产剧的借鉴意义”,它的理论意义大概是丰富了国产剧的研究方向或者开创了国产剧研究的新方向…)现实意义:是说你研究的论文对相关领域的现状有哪些具体的作用,有什么实质性的帮助,要落实到实践层面…就不举例子了^_^

根据你的选题来决定形式,同时研究的目的、意义也就是为什么要研究、研究它有什么价值。这一般可以先从现实需要方面去论述,指出现实当中存在这个问题,需要去研究,去解决,本论文的研究有什么实际作用,然后,再写论文的理论和学术价值。这些都要写得具体一点,有针对性一点,不能漫无边际地空喊口号。对于创作上的问题可以来职称驿站网看看。

毕业论文研究意义怎么写,两个例子帮你提升

法律英语论文研究方向选题意义大吗

联系方式哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈

The theory of criminal law of shallow understanding irrtumslehreLegal irrtumslehre, namely, refers to the illegality mistake for own behavior in law, whether what crime constitutes a crime shall be punished by, or what is wrong, is to oneself the legal nature of the action of meaning or Legal irrtumslehre usually includes three conditions: (1) the actor's behavior in law does not constitute a crime, the offender and constitutes a crime for which imaginary guilty, (2) the behavior in law constitutes a crime and does not constitute a crime, the offender mistaken assumptions that innocent, (3) for his act constitutes a crime shall be convicted and punishment in light of the existing errors, misunderstanding or Due to the legal irrtumslehre, only to the behavior of the offender is not correct understanding of the legal assessment, and for their actions in fact correct understanding of the situation is still there, so its act constitutes a crime shall be investigated for criminal responsibility is and how it is not usually (1)Imaginary innocent treatment principleThe principles for imaginary innocence, whether it involves a deliberately Foreign criminal law theory basically has the following kinds:1)Should know that don't speak, just for criminal facts have Canada criminal code article 19 regulation: "the ignorance of the law excuses and crime can be ShuZui " Motto: "Roman law and legal disclaimer" somehow also expressed a principle, namely: "in the crime as subjective FanYi established condition, not request to recognize his behavior of richtswitrig"2)Should know the reason, according to two: moral responsibility theory, personality responsibility Moral responsibility theory emphasizes on the rationality of free will blame illegal conduct, is considered to be objective 3)That said, the possible illegality of responsibility for deliberately, at least to the possibility of understanding While in China mainland, the introduction of the concept of crime has another concept -- social consciousness that harm to discuss richtswitrig already Because the deliberate crime according to law condemn the illegality of the offender is not known, the law itself is not damaged, the law of the social consciousness is Social harm consciousness is the essential contents of the crime, illegal consciousness is the legal form of social Therefore, our country law more emphasis is on the rationality of essence, which is harmful to the society Just because of its social harmfulness, with a social moral evaluation colour, easier for people to grasp and Therefore, the author thinks that, in general, the person need to recognize his behavior may be the result of inevitable or harmful to the society, and has already With intentionally But in fact, the forbidden by law and mass that is harmful to the society in our country nowadays the behavior under the constitution should be consistent, in other words, know the social harmfulness also know the possibility of illegal, but know the possibility of illegal is inevitable should also realize social harmfulness, both are Therefore, it is generally thought that the law is no excuse, the reason of law does not exclude the misunderstanding in principle, but can be culpable for deliberately (2) Misunderstandings treatment PunishmentWe might as well so the essence of blame for his due: the crime in the subjective should blame or blame, for the intent or negligence If the offender because of misunderstanding that legal person feels very innocent, lack of this should blame or condemning sexual, from the fundamental measure, blame is absolutely not consider Especially in the modern society, the legal category SAN marino, legal entry in different fields and different levels of books, recognized, comprehend legal apparently endless and same, so the person of law and misunderstandings, not Now, both in theory and practice, the method not cling to forgive "seems to have in Therefore, to a certain extent, can also think admits exceptions excusable is legal misunderstanding of criminal law is an important symbol of In addition, it was not in the act of which is prohibited by the laws and regulations, especially after a circumstance, should have knowledge of richtswitrig actor, constitute the understanding of deliberate point of view, with the attitude of this understanding, of course, that is not the illegality or by the simple statement The author thinks that the only when the legal establishment of may, FangKeZu but The fact mistakeThat mistake, is to determine its subjective behavior nature and the criminal responsibility of the relevant facts wrong From the wrong reasons and phenomenon of angles, generally known that there are several mistakes:(1) Object irrtumslehreThe object is known for errors, whether there is objectively error It includes actor in the implementation of the existing criminal behavior of the hazards for the object and actually does not exist, or for criminal object and actually does not exist, or infringe a criminal object and actually invaded another crime The object of objects is usually known errors caused by mistake, but the object of different social relationship reflects Evil doer of objects and actual expected in fact not only harm object does not agree, and in the nature of law is not Therefore, the object irrtumslehre may affect the form of sin, crime accomplishment, and may even attempted to influence the For example, in view of the circumstances, not a thought before the enemy, and a party came to stick, afterwards just know the ox was A thought of damage is "people", and the actual wounded is "cow", do not belong to the same laws of the Similar situation and will generally be mistaken for drug trafficking items, Actor will stolen items in the theft of guns in stealing This object from the subjective errors, see, is a kind of mistake, From the objective, because the mistake crime to no avail, where the criminal attempted 1)Object mistakeObjects can be generalized mistake, including object mistake to belong to the object know mistake is inevitable object These include, is known to be wrong object of legal property of the same object mistake and legal properties of different objects, namely the object irrtumslehre In order to distinguish with the object mistake here, the cognition to the same object only mean error between the different objects, namely the misunderstanding of the evil doer expected objects and actual harm to the object, but not in fact in the legal nature of the same This object mistake again say things on purpose mistake not criminal As a reserve, killing b shall be killed as b and c, do not affect a This is the need to consider that a kill b behavior "mistake" cause others (c), belong to an intentional crime (b) "death", for the excess result, according to the results, which determine the ordinary mail of death was deliberately recognized for deliberately, to the death of the fault is propylene, identified as negligence, according to the intention or negligence of the general mark recognized FanYi or state of mind, not applicable rules of the 2) Behavior irrtumslehreBehavior mainly includes two kind of mistake: first, the behavior nature That actor has to its social harm nature, such as understanding not imaginary Behavior nature mistake might affect the form of sin, and may also affect Second, the behavior tools (methods) That person to use when the conduct of tool (methods), which affects not correct understanding of harm results, behavior tools (methods) mistake can affect crime or attempted was founded, also can affect crime or belongs to the incident, a typical for murder on hazardous substances, because the drug failure and failed to kill people, can think method or tools for error doer of consciousness beyond reason not to And as actor see armour, second coming together, hence shot to play, but can't hit by the party Look, this is from the phenomenon of an object, or the final results for the mistake, but this error is based on the fact that the wrong doer identify offender is carefully identify to begin, can think recognize is accurate, errors in ChaWu The solution to this situation, "said", its legal with qualitative and recognize wrong object is consistent, namely directly recognized as an intentional homicide The death of a person is directly intentionally to b, death is the indirect intentional, just for a to b is attempted, Additionally, if in daily life because misidentification object and damage of consequences, the crime itself is not just any criminal negligence because of 3)Causality irrtumslehreCausality mistake, is on his behavior and harmful results of actual connection between Generally include: first, not some harm result, as has happened This generally constitute a Second, has certain harm result, but not for actor or for his behavior is caused, and does not affect crime Third, really happened, the offender is aware of its behavior, but with the actual development between the harm to the process or a mistake, general to punish crime In theory, the offender is not only a crime, but continuous movement, this several continuous action is not a few crime, but a In this sense, doesn't exist on the results of the Legal irrtumslehre and facts mistake and proceduresDomestic scholars in fact know mistakes and errors between the issue legal representative views mainly include:(1)For own behavior whether in law constitutes a crime, criminal or what kind of criminal punishment shall be under the incorrect understanding is legal irrtumslehre for his behavior on the implementation of the incorrect understanding is the fact that mistake,(2)The objectivity of crime is a false understanding of crime, that mistake of objective facts have clear understanding, only to act in the evaluation of existing laws on the concept of law is not correct mistakes。(3)Actor known facts and actual fact don't agree is wrong, the person that judgment and objective law is law of illegal inconsistency These ideas basically could in theory and legal irrtumslehre fact distinguish mistakes, it is important to emphasize that:1) With the conviction that the so-called irrelevant, as this mistake to hit each other, the shooting head caused the death of heart, without vision of research into 2) Study of the theory of error, error occurs when the purpose, but whether to intentionally resistance, reduce plots affected only the wrong cognition, natural sentencing nor will it into the error theory 3) This does not constitute a crime and actor for crime, and for their behavior in the criminal law on the crimes and how to apply for criminal punishment on such specific knowledge error, conviction according to Based on this, the author thinks that, at the fact that criminal law is only to know wrong doer of elements to know the so-called objective facts constituents of mistake is the fact that the legal irrtumslehre error refers to the legal action is illegal and the evaluation of the From the theory of facts and legal irrtumslehre error, but the problem is in the law, criminal elements to the facts and law closely combined circumstances (like some administrative crimes and economic crimes), or is in a fact itself contains certain laws of evaluation content, to distinguish with a mistake is the fact that mistake or legal wrong, is often If the property of his humanity and obscenity obscenity, administrative rules and regulations, JinYuOu, disrupt public until its precondition of the legitimacy of the public, and legal irrtumslehre facts wrong intertwined, and this is what we distinguish facts and legal irrtumslehre errors will solve the In some cases, the defendant should know that because of the lack of knowledge, and not to the behavior of social harmfulness, so that the defendant is not "knowledge they will entail harmful consequences to society, and hope or allows such results" and deliberate crime, the burden of proof is only FanYi prosecution, in addition, prosecution without proof the defendant not normal, but normal mental and spiritual normal presumption defendant directly if the defendant that his spirit is not normal, it shall provide necessary evidence by himself to Thus, the author, on legal irrtumslehre processing, can adopt the presumption of ways to Which country presumption every normal citizens are known, unless the law can put forward defense "advantage prove" above, or the evidence rebut these presumption is From the efficiency of lawsuit, said the country is impossible to prove the defendant is known of the

上数据库(大学里都有)搜索与你题目相同或相似或相关的论文看看别人的绪论或前言写什么,你参考着写就行。  帮您找到了一篇“油价上涨和高空驰率对上海出租车行业的影响及对策” :  城市交通可持续发展的内涵包括经济、社会和环境可持续性三个方面。当前.“建设节约型社会. 走可持续发展道路”是我国的基本国策, 但随着国际油价的持续上涨, 出租车行业受我国资源短缺和脆弱环境的影响不断显现出来。本文就油价上涨和高空驰率对上海出租车行业的影响进行分析并提出一些政策性建议。  上海出租车行业在经历了2 0 世纪8 0 年代后期和9 0 年代前期近1 0年的快速发展后. 在最近1 0 来年中进入了一个相对平稳的发展阶段。统计数据表明: 行业车辆数量增幅不大的同时运营收入增长明显。截至2 0 0 6 年底. 该行业已经发展到拥有4 8 0 2 2 辆各类出租车、从业人员近1 0万、年载客5 8 9 2 亿次、年运营里程B 1 0 5 亿公里、年运营收入达1 2 4 9 7亿元的规模。  统计分析结果表明: 除夜间时段外. 其他各不同时段出租车空车流量都服从P o is s o n 分布. 工作时段平均空车流量最大. 中午和晚上时段平均空车流量最小。行业平均服务水平在最繁忙时段内每分钟平均0 . 7 2 辆空车,服务水平最好的时段内大约1 8 1 3 秒可以等到一辆空车。这样的服务水平比许多出租车公司承诺的“电话叫车后1 0 分钟到达“的标准要好. 这也许部分地给出了为什么上海消费者偏好扬招方式的原因, 同时也可以看出上出租车行业在较民出行. 所以. 不业不具备社会可持续性。1 . 燃料价格上涨与空驰率居高不下并行利用官方统计数据可整理出上海出租车行业近年运营数据如下。经简单计算知: 上海出租车行业近年的平均空驰率在4 2 % 以上,2 0 0 6年有大约2 4 3 3 亿公里是车辆空驰里程。另一方面. 随着近年全球石油价格波动. 国内燃料价格呈攀升且加速趋势。  来源:360论文网。

通常英语专业毕业从事法律工作的,一般都是做法律文件的翻译,如果同时有法律背景的,一般就是做法律文件英文版本的起草。所以,如果你没有法律教育背景,建议还是从“如何做好法律文件的翻译”的某一个题目去写。比如,法律文件翻译和一般文件翻译的不同之处什么的。。希望对你有帮助。

法律英语论文研究方向选题背景怎么填

论文选题背景可以按照模板来写,包括这三大内容即可:论文研究背景,选题的意义与价值,课题的研究意义与目的。一、论文研究背景论文研究背景的写作主要有以下几个要点:社会大环境如何【可利用国家数据网站发布的数据做支撑】行业环境如何【可以利用行业报告做支撑】目前需要解决的问题【自己论述】二、选题的意义与价值选题的意义与价值写作要点在于论文为何写作本论文,告知写作的原因和意图。也就是论述论文的意义和价值,一般明确下面两个写作要点会使得写作难度降低,如下:理论方面一般有以下几种情况:(1)就哲学的高度而言,需要研究的价值意义(2)就专业或学科角度而言,需要研究的价值意义(3)就某个理论角度而言,需要研究的价值意义实践方面主要包括:(1)就实际的工作实践活动未来发展趋势、前景而言,需要研究的价值意义(2)就实际的现在工作的实践活动而言,需要研究的价值意义(3)就实际的现在工作的实践活动改进而言,需要研究的价值意义三、课题的研究意义与目的确定自己研究的逻辑起点,也就是要讲明在别人研究的基础上自己将要做的探讨是什么?即为什么写这篇论文以及要解决什么问题。

回答 根据自己的专业方向填写就可以了我的理解是,研究方向,是技术专业背景下,比较具体的研究主题。1、了解自己感兴趣的课题能够研究自己感兴趣的内容是一件很幸运的事情。日常学习与翻阅专业文献,可以帮助你更好地找到自己的兴趣点。有了感兴趣的内容,就要付之实践。首先是查找相关资料,通过知网等工具可以轻松地检索到自己感兴趣内容的相关文献,当然还可以通过百度、谷歌等浏览器以及图书馆等社会资源下载所需文献。有了详细的了解之后,再考虑是否要进行更深层次的研究。 2、明确导师的研究方向了解导师制定的研究方向和预期目标是确定研究内容的又一行之有效的方法。首先,应当详细地了解导师的研究方向。其次,如果是导师给出的研究方向,那么一般是可行的;这时我们就要积极与导师沟通,了解导师对于该课题的想法;在进行充分、有效地交流之后,我们就要对导师提出的建议进行认真考虑,可行度较高的话,就可以着手开始搜集资料,为论文完成打好基础。3、确定研究思路和计划“书读百遍,其义自见”,通过与导师、学长学姐的沟通,我们可能会对这个课题有一定新的认识,确定了研究方向之后,就要对近几年的文献进行更深的了解。精读和泛读相结合,同时对论文的主要观点、论证方式进行记录,同时要进行思考研究课题目前存在的问题以及需要改进的地方,形成一个完整的研究计划。

就是你目前的研究方向啊 或者你的二级学科名字 和你们实验室的大部队一起填就好了 一个实验室 方向都差不多

这个的话我帮你写好以后发到你的QQ邮箱里吧。

相关百科
热门百科
首页
发表服务