中国古代法律论文题目大全初中英语

驳论是就一定的事件和问题发表议论，揭露和驳斥错误的、反动的见解或主张。驳斥错误的、反动的论点有三种形式：①直接驳斥对方的论点。先举出对方的荒谬论点，然后用正确的道理和确凿的事实直接加以驳斥，揭示出谎言同事实、谬论与真理之间的矛盾。有的文章，首先证明与论敌的论点相对立的论点是正确的，以此来证明论敌的论点是错误的。②通过批驳对方的论据来驳倒对方的论点。论据是论点的根据，是证明论点的。错误和反动的论点，往往是建立在虚假的论据之上的，论据驳倒了，论点也就站不住脚了。③通过批驳对方的论证过程的谬误（驳其论证）来驳倒对方的论点。驳倒了它的论证中关键问题，也就把谬论驳倒了。驳论文的驳法有三种：反驳论点、反驳论据、反驳论证。反驳论证相对于前两者更高了一个层次。

The theory of criminal law of shallow understanding irrtumslehreLegal irrtumslehre， namely， refers to the illegality mistake for own behavior in law， whether what crime constitutes a crime shall be punished by， or what is wrong， is to oneself the legal nature of the action of meaning or Legal irrtumslehre usually includes three conditions: (1) the actor's behavior in law does not constitute a crime， the offender and constitutes a crime for which imaginary guilty， (2) the behavior in law constitutes a crime and does not constitute a crime， the offender mistaken assumptions that innocent， (3) for his act constitutes a crime shall be convicted and punishment in light of the existing errors， misunderstanding or Due to the legal irrtumslehre， only to the behavior of the offender is not correct understanding of the legal assessment， and for their actions in fact correct understanding of the situation is still there， so its act constitutes a crime shall be investigated for criminal responsibility is and how it is not usually （1）Imaginary innocent treatment principleThe principles for imaginary innocence， whether it involves a deliberately Foreign criminal law theory basically has the following kinds:1）Should know that don't speak， just for criminal facts have Canada criminal code article 19 regulation: "the ignorance of the law excuses and crime can be ShuZui " Motto: "Roman law and legal disclaimer" somehow also expressed a principle， namely: "in the crime as subjective FanYi established condition， not request to recognize his behavior of richtswitrig"2）Should know the reason， according to two: moral responsibility theory， personality responsibility Moral responsibility theory emphasizes on the rationality of free will blame illegal conduct， is considered to be objective 3）That said， the possible illegality of responsibility for deliberately， at least to the possibility of understanding While in China mainland， the introduction of the concept of crime has another concept -- social consciousness that harm to discuss richtswitrig already Because the deliberate crime according to law condemn the illegality of the offender is not known， the law itself is not damaged， the law of the social consciousness is Social harm consciousness is the essential contents of the crime， illegal consciousness is the legal form of social Therefore， our country law more emphasis is on the rationality of essence， which is harmful to the society Just because of its social harmfulness， with a social moral evaluation colour， easier for people to grasp and Therefore， the author thinks that， in general， the person need to recognize his behavior may be the result of inevitable or harmful to the society， and has already With intentionally But in fact， the forbidden by law and mass that is harmful to the society in our country nowadays the behavior under the constitution should be consistent， in other words， know the social harmfulness also know the possibility of illegal， but know the possibility of illegal is inevitable should also realize social harmfulness， both are Therefore， it is generally thought that the law is no excuse， the reason of law does not exclude the misunderstanding in principle， but can be culpable for deliberately （2） Misunderstandings treatment PunishmentWe might as well so the essence of blame for his due: the crime in the subjective should blame or blame， for the intent or negligence If the offender because of misunderstanding that legal person feels very innocent， lack of this should blame or condemning sexual， from the fundamental measure， blame is absolutely not consider Especially in the modern society， the legal category SAN marino， legal entry in different fields and different levels of books， recognized， comprehend legal apparently endless and same， so the person of law and misunderstandings， not Now， both in theory and practice， the method not cling to forgive "seems to have in Therefore， to a certain extent， can also think admits exceptions excusable is legal misunderstanding of criminal law is an important symbol of In addition， it was not in the act of which is prohibited by the laws and regulations， especially after a circumstance， should have knowledge of richtswitrig actor， constitute the understanding of deliberate point of view， with the attitude of this understanding， of course， that is not the illegality or by the simple statement The author thinks that the only when the legal establishment of may， FangKeZu but The fact mistakeThat mistake， is to determine its subjective behavior nature and the criminal responsibility of the relevant facts wrong From the wrong reasons and phenomenon of angles， generally known that there are several mistakes:（1） Object irrtumslehreThe object is known for errors， whether there is objectively error It includes actor in the implementation of the existing criminal behavior of the hazards for the object and actually does not exist， or for criminal object and actually does not exist， or infringe a criminal object and actually invaded another crime The object of objects is usually known errors caused by mistake， but the object of different social relationship reflects Evil doer of objects and actual expected in fact not only harm object does not agree， and in the nature of law is not Therefore， the object irrtumslehre may affect the form of sin， crime accomplishment， and may even attempted to influence the For example， in view of the circumstances， not a thought before the enemy， and a party came to stick， afterwards just know the ox was A thought of damage is "people"， and the actual wounded is "cow"， do not belong to the same laws of the Similar situation and will generally be mistaken for drug trafficking items， Actor will stolen items in the theft of guns in stealing This object from the subjective errors， see， is a kind of mistake， From the objective， because the mistake crime to no avail， where the criminal attempted 1）Object mistakeObjects can be generalized mistake， including object mistake to belong to the object know mistake is inevitable object These include， is known to be wrong object of legal property of the same object mistake and legal properties of different objects， namely the object irrtumslehre In order to distinguish with the object mistake here， the cognition to the same object only mean error between the different objects， namely the misunderstanding of the evil doer expected objects and actual harm to the object， but not in fact in the legal nature of the same This object mistake again say things on purpose mistake not criminal As a reserve， killing b shall be killed as b and c， do not affect a This is the need to consider that a kill b behavior "mistake" cause others (c)， belong to an intentional crime (b) "death"， for the excess result， according to the results， which determine the ordinary mail of death was deliberately recognized for deliberately， to the death of the fault is propylene， identified as negligence， according to the intention or negligence of the general mark recognized FanYi or state of mind， not applicable rules of the 2） Behavior irrtumslehreBehavior mainly includes two kind of mistake: first， the behavior nature That actor has to its social harm nature， such as understanding not imaginary Behavior nature mistake might affect the form of sin， and may also affect Second， the behavior tools (methods) That person to use when the conduct of tool (methods)， which affects not correct understanding of harm results， behavior tools (methods) mistake can affect crime or attempted was founded， also can affect crime or belongs to the incident， a typical for murder on hazardous substances， because the drug failure and failed to kill people， can think method or tools for error doer of consciousness beyond reason not to And as actor see armour， second coming together， hence shot to play， but can't hit by the party Look， this is from the phenomenon of an object， or the final results for the mistake， but this error is based on the fact that the wrong doer identify offender is carefully identify to begin， can think recognize is accurate， errors in ChaWu The solution to this situation， "said"， its legal with qualitative and recognize wrong object is consistent， namely directly recognized as an intentional homicide The death of a person is directly intentionally to b， death is the indirect intentional， just for a to b is attempted， Additionally， if in daily life because misidentification object and damage of consequences， the crime itself is not just any criminal negligence because of 3)Causality irrtumslehreCausality mistake， is on his behavior and harmful results of actual connection between Generally include: first， not some harm result， as has happened This generally constitute a Second， has certain harm result， but not for actor or for his behavior is caused， and does not affect crime Third， really happened， the offender is aware of its behavior， but with the actual development between the harm to the process or a mistake， general to punish crime In theory， the offender is not only a crime， but continuous movement， this several continuous action is not a few crime， but a In this sense， doesn't exist on the results of the Legal irrtumslehre and facts mistake and proceduresDomestic scholars in fact know mistakes and errors between the issue legal representative views mainly include:（1）For own behavior whether in law constitutes a crime， criminal or what kind of criminal punishment shall be under the incorrect understanding is legal irrtumslehre for his behavior on the implementation of the incorrect understanding is the fact that mistake，（2）The objectivity of crime is a false understanding of crime， that mistake of objective facts have clear understanding， only to act in the evaluation of existing laws on the concept of law is not correct mistakes。（3）Actor known facts and actual fact don't agree is wrong， the person that judgment and objective law is law of illegal inconsistency These ideas basically could in theory and legal irrtumslehre fact distinguish mistakes， it is important to emphasize that：1) With the conviction that the so-called irrelevant， as this mistake to hit each other， the shooting head caused the death of heart， without vision of research into 2) Study of the theory of error， error occurs when the purpose， but whether to intentionally resistance， reduce plots affected only the wrong cognition， natural sentencing nor will it into the error theory 3) This does not constitute a crime and actor for crime， and for their behavior in the criminal law on the crimes and how to apply for criminal punishment on such specific knowledge error， conviction according to Based on this， the author thinks that， at the fact that criminal law is only to know wrong doer of elements to know the so-called objective facts constituents of mistake is the fact that the legal irrtumslehre error refers to the legal action is illegal and the evaluation of the From the theory of facts and legal irrtumslehre error， but the problem is in the law， criminal elements to the facts and law closely combined circumstances (like some administrative crimes and economic crimes)， or is in a fact itself contains certain laws of evaluation content， to distinguish with a mistake is the fact that mistake or legal wrong， is often If the property of his humanity and obscenity obscenity， administrative rules and regulations， JinYuOu， disrupt public until its precondition of the legitimacy of the public， and legal irrtumslehre facts wrong intertwined， and this is what we distinguish facts and legal irrtumslehre errors will solve the In some cases， the defendant should know that because of the lack of knowledge， and not to the behavior of social harmfulness， so that the defendant is not "knowledge they will entail harmful consequences to society， and hope or allows such results" and deliberate crime， the burden of proof is only FanYi prosecution， in addition， prosecution without proof the defendant not normal， but normal mental and spiritual normal presumption defendant directly if the defendant that his spirit is not normal， it shall provide necessary evidence by himself to Thus， the author， on legal irrtumslehre processing， can adopt the presumption of ways to Which country presumption every normal citizens are known， unless the law can put forward defense "advantage prove" above， or the evidence rebut these presumption is From the efficiency of lawsuit， said the country is impossible to prove the defendant is known of the

自己去看下（法学）吧，看下别人的论题是什么，你参考学习下

1、网约车违约的法律问题研究　　2、论家庭暴力的法律对策研究　　3、我国失地农民社会保障问题探讨　　4、论环境污染侵权责任制度的完善---以XX县为例　　5、校园暴力的成因及法律预防　　6、论我国持有型犯罪的立法缺陷与完善　　7、论大学生兼职的劳动权益保护　　8、论法律行为和情谊行为的区分　　9、小额贷款公司法律问题研究　　10、论劳动合同法中的竞业限制制度　　11、论共同犯罪中刑事责任的扩散　　12、论合同诈骗罪　　13、论网络时代的隐私权保护　　14、企业高管人员适用劳动法问题研究　　15、网络交易平台消费者保护法律责任　　以上论文题目由学术堂整理提供

中国古代法律制度论文题目大全初中英语

通常英语专业毕业从事法律工作的，一般都是做法律文件的翻译，如果同时有法律背景的，一般就是做法律文件英文版本的起草。所以，如果你没有法律教育背景，建议还是从“如何做好法律文件的翻译”的某一个题目去写。比如，法律文件翻译和一般文件翻译的不同之处什么的。。希望对你有帮助。

中国古代法律史的论文题目大全初中英语

参考答案　　唯一能伤我的射手

学术堂整理了十五个好写的法律论文题目供大家进行参考:　　论人工智能生成物的著作权保护　　网络游戏直播的著作权问题研究--以耀宇诉斗鱼案为例　　体育赛事直播节目的版权问题探析--以新浪网诉凤凰网中超体育赛事直播案为例　　同人作品的著作权问题研究--以金庸诉江南《此间的少年》侵权案为例　　论我国著作权法定许可制度的完善　　著作权延伸性集体管理制度研究　　图形用户界面(GUI)外观设计专利保护研究--兼评奇虎诉江民案　　我国引入局部外观设计专利制度的思考　　专利当然许可制度研究　　中国好声音商标侵权案评析　　王老吉加多宝知名商品特有包装装潢纠纷案评析　　我国声音商标的法律保护探析--以腾讯声音商标案为视角　　网络环境中不正当竞争行为的法律规制　　实用艺术品的知识产权保护　　知识产权与民法典的关系探讨

Abstract Punitive damages is designed not only to compensate the victim completely but also to punish the offenders and deter them from similar But when it is settled in our legal system and social surrounding， the above functions are unimportant and even It is not salutary to establish a punitive system in product liability of our The punished guilty relevant regulations about producing， selling the fake and common products of the Criminal Law includes both acts which result in product liability and probably result in product So other laws have not to and should not punish persons who have these The enterprise who obtains the illegal sales amount that under 50，000 Yuan would be punished by the existing civil compensation system， for its loss which caused by compensating the victim subtracted from its gain is Therefore our country present legal framework repels the punitive function of punitive Furthermore， by dint of the moral damages in the present civil compensatory system， the function of compensating completely could be Obviously， constructing punitive damages to realize this function is not In our country， punitive damages in contract responsibility mainly in the interest of consumer's benefits， but it is not On one hand， because legislators traced the transact course insufficiently， the law can not protect consumer's benefit well; On the other hand， although the original intention of legislation is prevent fraud， it has encouraged another kind of fraud because of the unapt In summary， considering our surroundings of law and economy， punitive damages should not build in the systems of product liability and contract

物权期待权与抵押权冲突的适用规则　　不动产买受人提起的执行异议之诉　　不动产事实物权　　让与担保的制度思考　　论流质契约的相对禁止　　商铺租赁权担保的体系定位与法律效力　　融资租赁(或售后回租)中租赁物之善意取得　　民法典编纂视角下动产担保物权对抗规则之重构　　论夫妻财产的潜在共有　　夫妻之间给予不动产约定的物权效力及救济　　夫妻财产制契约的效力与不动产物权变动　　一方擅自处分夫妻共有房产的规则适用　　(本回答来源于学术堂)

中国古代法律论文题目大全高中英语

中国古代法律史的论文题目大全初中英语版

1丶法制在我心中2、法律让我茁壮成长3、人人遵守交通法4、法网恢恢疏而不漏5、情大？法大？6、做一名知法懂法守法的大学生7、法制伴我行8、知法、懂法、守法9、那些年，我们一起打过的官司10、法制教育让我成长

学术堂整理了一部分新颖的法律论文题目，供大家进行参考：1、完善我国合宪性审查制度的思考2、地方人大保证宪法实施职能研究3、合宪性审查制度研究4、人大监督权与宪法实施研究5、我国宪法实施路径与方法研究6、论宪法解释的功能7、论大数据时代公民隐私权保护8、我国检察机关提起公益诉讼问题研究9、监察体制改革背景下检察机关的定位与职能调整研究10、设区市地方立法权问题研究11、论我国行政诉讼确认判决的定位12、论公务员的廉洁义务13、论教师基本权利的法律保护14、行政诉讼跨区管辖改革研究15、社区矫正的现、问题与对策--以六安市某县（区）为例16、公共服务外包法律规制

自己去看下（法学）吧，看下别人的论题是什么，你参考学习下